Pierre Yves Bailly vs Aleksandr Braynin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How effective is each player's second serve? Recently, Pierre Yves Bailly has captured 45.88% of his second serve points, while Aleksandr Braynin has achieved 39.52%. This indicates Bailly's slight edge in this facet.
• Which player is more successful in return games? Braynin slightly leads with a 51.07% win rate on opponent's second serve returns, compared to Bailly's 50.00%. However, Bailly returns first serves better, winning 30.28% against Braynin's 27.83%.
• Which player handles pressure better? Under pressure, Aleksandr Braynin edges out slightly by saving 52.14% of breakpoints, while Pierre Yves Bailly saves 51.43%.
• Considering match outcomes, Bailly has a significantly higher win percentage over the past year, winning 85.71% of his matches, compared to Braynin's 46.67%.
• What about surface preference? Both players perform best on Hard courts with a 77% win rate. Bailly struggles more on Clay, while Braynin finds Indoor Hard courts challenging.
• Experience level: While both players primarily compete at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K level, Bailly has a higher win rate of 85.71% compared to Braynin's 49.02% over the last year.
• In terms of competition quality, Braynin has faced generally tougher opponents with an average rank of 346.42, compared to Bailly's opponents' average rank of 548.79.
• How do they fare in deciding sets? Bailly has won 50% of deciding sets in the past 12 months, showing a slight advantage over Braynin's 43% win rate in similar situations.

Editorial Prediction (December 12, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the upcoming tennis match between Pierre Yves Bailly and Aleksandr Braynin, several key statistics come into play. Bailly exhibits a slightly superior performance in second serve points and first serve returns, which could play a crucial role in tight moments of the match.

While Braynin demonstrates marginally better pressure-handling through breakpoint saves, Bailly's impressive win record over the past year provides a strong case for his likelihood of success. Furthermore, his proven performance in deciding sets further consolidates his position as a well-rounded competitor.

The quality of opponents faced by Braynin adds another layer of complexity, indicating his experience against stronger players. However, Bailly's consistent results in matches within his tournament levels suggest he can handle the pressure effectively.

Considering all factors, especially Bailly's recent form and superior overall performance statistics, Pierre Yves Bailly emerges as the more probable victor in this encounter.